How to Communicate Evaluation Work in Design Science Research? An Exemplar Case Study

dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Anupen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorCater-Steel, Aileenen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorToleman, Marken_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-04T01:20:19Z
dc.date.available2014-12-04T01:20:19Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_NZ
dc.date.issued2014en_NZ
dc.description.abstractHow should we communicate evaluation work in design science research (DSR)? A case study based on our industry collaboration research project encountered this challenge after finding limited guidance on a structure to effectively communicate DSR evaluation work. We propose a logic model as a consistent reporting structure to communicate DSR evaluation by presenting a unified view of inputs, outputs, and immediate and long-term outcomes. The case study is based on an IT service organisation where a novel research artefact to conduct IT service process assessments was implemented. We present this case study as a real-life exemplar for an experimental design involving the use of a logic model to communicate DSR evaluation work. This case study provides a source of qualitative evaluation data to explore and subsequently analyse how the application of a simple logic model might provide the much needed structure to communicate critical evaluation activities in a DSR project.en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 8th - 10th December, Auckland, New Zealand
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-927184-26-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10292/8165
dc.publisherACIS
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.titleHow to Communicate Evaluation Work in Design Science Research? An Exemplar Case Studyen_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
acis20140_submission_167.pdf
Size:
159.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: