How repeatable are systematic reviews?

MacDonell, SG
Item type
Conference Contribution
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Brunel University

As a discipline relatively new to the conduct of systematic reviews it could be said that we are still "finding our way" in undertaking them. Still far from the norm in empirical software engineering, we are having to borrow models and guidelines from other fields and adapt them as we proceed. This is both appropriate and effective in terms of learning how to conduct a systematic review. Before we come to rely on such reviews too heavily, however, it is important to assess their reliability. We all appreciate the need to consider model credibility in our empirical work – similarly we should be considering review credibility. This talk will report on a comparison of two independent reviews intentionally undertaken with the same research issue in mind.

Meta-Level Learning (MeLLow) Workshop 2006, London, United Kingdom
Rights statement
Auckland University of Technology (AUT) encourages public access to AUT information and supports the legal use of copyright material in accordance with the Copyright Act 1994 (the Act) and the Privacy Act 1993. Unless otherwise stated, copyright material contained on this site may be in the intellectual property of AUT, a member of staff or third parties. Any commercial exploitation of this material is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the owner.