Mooney, S2022-11-012022-11-0120162016Work, Employment and Society, 30(4), 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170156207681469-87220950-0170https://hdl.handle.net/10292/15575This contribution proposes nimble intersectionality in response to McBride et al.’s article about intersectional research in the field of employment and industrial relations. Although the authors’ call for all researchers to be ‘intersectionally sensitive’ is positive, regrettably, by highlighting the problems with intersectional methods, they reinforce the widespread perception that they are too difficult to implement. While intersectionality is undeniably complex, this article argues that a nimble approach can help resolve methodological dilemmas. By resolving four basic methodological questions at the onset of a study, researchers can successfully use an intersectional approach to explore age, gender, ethnicity, race and class in employment.Authors retain the right to place his/her pre-publication version of the work on a personal website or institutional repository. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published. It is not the copy of record. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published by SAGE Publications Ltd. All rights reserved. © 2016. (please see Citation and Publisher’s Version).AgeClassEmploymentEthnicityGenderIntersectional methodsNimble intersectionalityRaceJournal ArticleOpenAccess10.1177/0950017015620768