Chandel, TanviMiranda, VictorLowe, AndrewLee, Tet Chuan2024-06-042024-06-042024-03-25Technologies, ISSN: 2227-7080 (Print); 2227-7080 (Online), MDPI AG, 12(4), 44-44. doi: 10.3390/technologies120400442227-70802227-7080http://hdl.handle.net/10292/17617Inaccuracies from devices for non-invasive blood pressure measurements have been well reported with clinical consequences. International standards, such as ISO 81060-2 and the seminal AAMI/ANSI SP10, define protocols and acceptance criteria for these devices. Prior to applying these standards, a sample size of N >= 85 is mandatory, that is, the number of distinct subcjects used to calculate device inaccuracies. Often, it is not possible to gather such a large sample. Many studies apply these standards with a smaller sample. The objective of the paper is to introduce a methodology that broadens the method first developed by the AAMI Sphygmomanometer Committee for accepting a blood pressure measurement device. We study changes in the acceptance region for various sample sizes using the sampling distribution for proportions and introduce a methodology for estimating the exact probability of the acceptance of a device. This enables the comparison of the accuracies of existing device development techniques even if they were studied with a smaller sample size. The study is useful in assisting BP measurement device manufacturers. To assist clinicians, we present a newly developed “bpAcc” package in R to evaluate acceptance statistics for various sample sizes.© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/40 Engineering4008 Electrical EngineeringBioengineering4 Detection, screening and diagnosis4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies4008 Electrical engineeringJournal ArticleOpenAccess10.3390/technologies12040044