Tudor, Keith2025-06-102025-06-102025-03-03Psychotherapy and Politics International, ISSN: 1476-9263 (Print); 1556-9195 (Online), Auckland University of Technology (AUT) Library, 23(1), 1-19. doi: 10.24135/ppi.v23i1.041476-92631556-9195http://hdl.handle.net/10292/19293This article is a critical review of and response to Colin Feltham’s article, ‘Psychotherapy in the UK: Multicultural, Eurocentric, and Americentric influences on a complex field in a troubled time’, also published in this issue. The article critiques the lack of method and/or underlying methodology in Feltham’s article, and, by contrast, offers a methodological basis for this critique of his article, which frames this response in terms of Feltham’s rhetoric (language), his references to tradition and to authority, and his lack of objectivity. In doing so, this article addresses and challenges Feltham’s use of unfounded generalisations and familiar tropes about multiculturalism, Anglo-and Americo-centrism, political correctness, wokeness, and all the other ills he attributes to ‘dominant leftist-progressive view[s]’ of psychotherapy and counselling in the United Kingdom—and, by implication, elsewhere. It also challenges what appears to be a certain obsession on Feltham’s part both with various forms and categories of Leftists, as well as with an idealised white indigenous Britishness.Copyright (c) 2025 Keith Tudor. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/5203 Clinical and Health Psychology52 Psychology1103 Clinical Sciences1606 Political Science4408 Political science5203 Clinical and health psychology5205 Social and personality psychologyJournal ArticleOpenAccess10.24135/ppi.v23i1.04