Besen, PriscilaBurgess, AndrewVallis, StacyMorrison, AnnMarks, StefanPiri, ImeldaShafiei, Marzieh2026-04-022026-04-022026-03-17Urbanization, Sustainability and Society, ISSN: 2976-8993 (Print); 2976-8993 (Online), Emerald, 3(4), 1-26. doi: 10.1108/uss-12-2024-00902976-89932976-8993http://hdl.handle.net/10292/20865Purpose: The design and maintenance of neighbourhoods can influence lifestyles, social interactions and quality of life. Tāmaki Makaurau/Auckland’s urban form is marked by extensive urban sprawl and low-density residential-only zones. While a few studies have assessed liveability in selected Aotearoa/New Zealand’s neighbourhoods, studies that compare residents’ perceived liveability across different areas of Auckland remain limited. This study aims to examine urban liveability perceptions in various Auckland neighbourhoods to understand how the built environment and amenities impact residents’ quality of life. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research methodology was used, collecting data from 164 residents through an online questionnaire distributed in eight Auckland suburbs. Results from the neighbourhoods of Massey, Mt. Eden, Northcote, Takanini and Saint Heliers are discussed in this paper, comparing areas distributed geographically across the territory which show significant contrasts. The data were analysed using descriptive and inferential (Kruskal–Wallis) statistics and discussed with information from spatial mapping. Findings: Perceptions of liveability vary across neighbourhoods. The overall results show the highest perceived liveability in Mt. Eden and Saint Heliers, and the lowest in Takanini and Massey. Street type, age, disability and work routine also influence perception of liveability. Results align with social deprivation indexes, canopy cover, walking frequencies and proximity to the city centre: higher liveability levels were found in the least deprived and greener areas located closer to the city centre, where there are higher rates of walking. Originality/value: This study highlights the social dimensions of liveability using residents’ perceptions with a holistic approach, including factors such as amenities, infrastructure, transport, safety and sense of community. The findings inform socioeconomic and built environment indicators of liveability, helping to create evidence-based policies and design practices for sustainable and well-connected future neighbourhoods.© 2026 Priscila Besen, Andrew Burgess, Stacy Vallis, Ann Morrison, Stefan Marks, Imelda Piri and Marzieh Shafiei. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/44 Human Society4406 Human Geography33 Built Environment and Design3304 Urban and Regional PlanningBasic Behavioral and Social ScienceBehavioral and Social Science11 Sustainable Cities and CommunitiesUrban liveabilitySDG 11 Sustainable cities and communitiesSustainable urbanisationPerceived liveabilitySocial sustainabilityUrban designUrban densificationUrban amenitiesJournal ArticleOpenAccess10.1108/uss-12-2024-0090