2026-09-24T10:11:47Zhttps://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/server/oai/requestoai:openrepository.aut.ac.nz:10292/101112026-06-13T16:11:01Zcom_10292_3col_10292_4
AUT Research Repository
advisor
Craig, Geoffrey
advisor
Crothers, Charles
author
Mules, Philippa (Pip)
2016-10-28T02:35:26Z
2016-10-28T02:35:26Z
2016
https://hdl.handle.net/10292/10111
This doctoral thesis is about knowledge and knowing. It considers how the medium by which
knowledge is stored and shared influences perceptions about the value and validity of
knowledge. The analysis is based on the idea that the unique material composition of the
knowledge media of the time, rather than being merely a conduit for transmitting ideational
content, deeply influences beliefs about knowledge.
A number of theorists (Eisenstein, 2013; McLuhan, 1962, 1969, 1994; Postman, 2005; Ong,
1977a, 2004, 2012) have analysed how the material composition of mass-print has influenced
perceptions of knowledge. Walter Ong (2004) conducted an extensive analysis of early forms
of textbooks. In this analysis he found that textbooks have profoundly influenced
epistemological beliefs since the Enlightenment, but their influence arose not as a result of
good pedagogical design, but as an unintended consequence of the unique affordances and
constraints of the highly mechanised production cycles associated with mass-printed texts. As a
result of the mechanical processes associated with mass-printing beliefs about knowing and
knowledge were based on representations of the world laid out on the printed page (Ong,
2012).
Until approximately 35 years ago the Western world used mainly the same primary media for
representing, storing and disseminating pedagogical knowledge that had been used for the
previous 500 years. In other words the material composition of the media by which knowledge
has been transacted has been stable. But it is clear that a period of intense change is occurring
as knowledge media are increasingly digitised at all stages of their production, distribution and
consumption cycles. As a result of the processes of digitisation knowledge media are more
multimodal, increasingly dispersed beyond one certified knowledge medium and increasingly
located outside the nexus of the classroom.
Media ecologists, particularly McLuhan (1994) and Ong (1977a, 2004, 2012), have speculated
about the epistemological changes that the digitised knowledge environment would bring, but
they tended to take a hypothetical approach to considering these changes. This research seeks
to bring a more fine-grained methodological approach to these speculations by developing a
media-based methodology (or lens) that shows how knowledge seekers’ incremental sensory
interactions with the modal composition of knowledge media are mediating changes to beliefs
about knowledge.
This research compares three specific examples of knowledge media diachronically along the
material axes of time, space and the extent to which the authentic voice of the ‘others’ who are
mutually engaged in the knowledge transaction can be heard. The three media are: a 1960s
classroom textbook—Vernon, A. (1965). Human interaction: An introduction to sociology.
New York, NY: The Ronald Press Company; a classroom textbook from 2010—Carl, J.
(2010). Think sociology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; and the Wikibook—
Introduction to Sociology (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Sociology).
The research finds that, as knowledge media are becoming increasingly digitised, a number of
subtle epistemological changes are emerging: knowing is increasingly becoming a process of
emotional connection with others rather than intellectual engagement with complex analytic
categories; personal stories are becoming valued as a way of coming to know; and
interpersonal connectedness and trust are increasingly perceived as valued sources of authority.
In other words, the digitised knowledge environment is, rather serendipitously, increasingly
facilitating more constructivist beliefs about knowledge.
Despite this increased capacity for digitised knowledge media to mediate more constructivist
personal epistemological beliefs, this research finds, rather alarmingly, that there are parallels
between Ong’s (2004) findings and the current epistemological period: new knowledge media
are being incorporated into classroom practice with limited attention to the influence that their
modal composition is having on beliefs about knowledge and knowing. This inattention has
significant implications for learning and teaching at this time of large-scale investment in new
knowledge media. The research provides insight into how the characteristics of the ‘packaging’
of knowledge shapes perceptions of it. It provides a lens to help teachers, educational policy
makers and planners avoid sleepwalking into the 21st century with 19th century perceptions
(McLuhan, Fiore & Agel, 1967), and to advance academic consideration of these matters.
en
Epistemology
Textbooks
Media ecology
Materiality
Making Sense of Pedagogical Knowledge Media: An Analysis of How Modal Composition Influences Epistemological Beliefs
Thesis
PGI+REVDTEFSQVRJT048L2I+DQoNCjxwPlRoaXMgdGhlc2lzIGlzIG15IG93biB3b3JrIGFuZCwgdG8gdGhlIGJlc3Qgb2YgbXkga25vd2xlZGdlIGFuZCBiZWxpZWYsIGl0IGNvbnRhaW5zOg0KPHVsPg0KPGxpPiBubyBtYXRlcmlhbCBwcmV2aW91c2x5IHB1Ymxpc2hlZCBvciB3cml0dGVuIGJ5IGFub3RoZXIgcGVyc29uLCBleGNlcHQgd2hlcmUgdGhpcyBpcyBleHBsaWNpdGx5PGJyPmRlZmluZWQgaW4gdGhlIGFja25vd2xlZGdlbWVudHM7PC9saT4NCjxsaT5ubyBtYXRlcmlhbCB3aGljaCB0byBhIHN1YnN0YW50aWFsIGV4dGVudCBoYXMgYmVlbiBhY2NlcHRlZCBmb3IgdGhlIHF1YWxpZmljYXRpb24gb2YgYW55IG90aGVyPGJyPmRlZ3JlZSBvciBkaXBsb21hIG9mIGEgdW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvciBvdGhlciBpbnN0aXR1dGlvbiBvZiBoaWdoZXIgbGVhcm5pbmcuPC9saT4NCjwvdWw+DQo8Yj5UaGlyZCBQYXJ0eSBDb3B5cmlnaHQgU3RhdGVtZW50PC9iPg0KPHA+SSBoYXZlIGVpdGhlciB1c2VkIG5vIHN1YnN0YW50aWFsIHBvcnRpb25zIG9mIHRoaXJkIHBhcnR5IGNvcHlyaWdodCBtYXRlcmlhbCwgaW5jbHVkaW5nIGNoYXJ0cyw8YnI+ZGlhZ3JhbXMsIGdyYXBocywgcGhvdG9ncmFwaHMgb3IgbWFwcywgaW4gbXkgdGhlc2lzIG9yIEkgaGF2ZSBvYnRhaW5lZCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uIGZvciBzdWNoIG1hdGVyaWFsPGJyPnRvIGJlIG1hZGUgYWNjZXNzaWJsZSB3b3JsZHdpZGUgdmlhIHRoZSBpbnRlcm5ldC4gSWYgcGVybWlzc2lvbiBoYXMgbm90IGJlZW4gb2J0YWluZWQsIEkgaGF2ZTxicj5hc2tlZC93aWxsIGFzayB0aGUgTGlicmFyeSB0byByZW1vdmUgdGhlIHRoaXJkIHBhcnR5IGNvcHlyaWdodCBtYXRlcmlhbCBmcm9tIHRoZSBkaWdpdGFsIGNvcHkuPC9wPg==
URL
https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstreams/5d4bcd78-f857-4768-a32a-52e0ec0ea7d9/download
File
MD5
deeadfe6c67799513af74e94673e67b9
2662693
application/pdf
MulesPA.pdf
URL
https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstreams/aa56db56-deca-4d9a-b125-5848ecf453df/download
File
MD5
ee4c7ff95b5e3869a4efb609120bb7af
670639
text/plain
MulesPA.pdf.txt