Doing Robust Hermeneutic Phenomenology: Reflexive Engagement Within Circles of Understanding

Spence, D
Item type
Conference Contribution
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, the University of Alberta

The philosophy articulated by Gadamer, asserts that all understanding is interpretive thus requiring that researchers pay careful attention to the ways in which prior understandings inform the practice of research in an ongoing manner. Supervisors of students undertaking hermeneutic research encourage the declaration of pre-understandings prior to commencing data collection. This can be a way of ‘bracketing’ and thus bounding prior knowledge. Yet, how is this possible when understandings are dynamic and evolutionary? And should we be limiting research thinking in this way when not only do we endeavour to expand existing boundaries but inherent in the notion of understanding as fusion of horizons is the ever present possibility of coming to new and different understanding? This paper will focus on ways in which supervisors of students using philosophical hermeneutics employ questioning to reveal the relationships between experience, tradition and language. Discussion will centre on ‘presuppositions’ interviewing, ongoing journaling and the careful selection of words that clarify, refine and crystallise meaning which together constitute an approach that reflectively and reflexively ‘writes through’ rather than ‘writes up’ research findings.

14th Annual Qualitative Methods Conference held at Crown Convention Centre, Melbourne, 2015-04-27 to 2015-04-30, published in: Doing Robust Hermeneutic Phenomenology: Reflexive engagement within circles of understanding
Rights statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in (see Citation). The original publication is available at (see Publisher's Version).