Does buyer-seller similarity affect buyer satisfaction with the seller firm?

Date
2012
Authors
Gaur, SS
Herjanto, H
Bathula, H
Supervisor
Item type
Journal Article
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Abstract

With the increased reliance on diverse markets in multi-cultural contexts, the role that similarity can play in the relationship between a salesperson and a buyer is receiving increased attention. Similarity is regarded as the cornerstone of positive communications, and salespeople rely on the trust that can be created by this recognition of likeness. However, there are different types of similarity, and not all have an equal bearing on the salesperson-buyer relationship. In this study, we examine similarity in appearance, similarity in lifestyle, and similarity in status. Most studies go no further than examining the effect of similarity on a buyer’s satisfaction with a salesperson, and to date there appear to be few studies relating to the effect of similarity on satisfaction with a firm. This study examines the effect of similarity on a buyer’s sense of satisfaction with a firm represented by a salesperson in the banking context. The results of the study show that appearance similarity and status similarity have a significant effect on the salesperson-buyer relationship, whereas lifestyle similarity has no effect. The buyer’s satisfaction with a salesperson is found to mediate the relationship between similarity in appearance and the buyer’s satisfaction with a firm. In this paper, we discuss these findings and look at their implications for both research and practice. Findings of the study are particularly important because of New Zealand’s increasing interaction with Asia and its people, which has transformed New Zealand to become a multi-cultural and multi-ethnic country.

Description
Keywords
Similarity , Buyer-seller relationship , Satisfaction with seller’s firm , Satisfaction with salesperson , Asia , New Zealand , Banking
Source
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, vol.22(3), pp.315 - 335
Rights statement
Copyright © 2012 Taylor & Francis. This is a preprint of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in the The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research and is available online at: www.tandfonline.com with the open URL of your article (see Publisher’s Version).