A Trojan Horse for Positivism? A Critique of Mixed Methods Research

Giddings, L
Grant, B
Item type
Journal Article
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
AUT University; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Mixed methods research is captured by a pragmatically inflected form of postpositivism. Although it passes for an alternative methodological movement that purports to breach the divide between qualitative and quantitative research, most mixed methods studies favor the forms of analysis and truth finding associated with positivism. We anticipate a move away from exploring more philosophical questions or undertaking modes of enquiry that challenge the status quo. At the same time, we recognize that mixed methods research offers particular strengths and that, although it serves as a Trojan Horse for positivism, it may productively carry other paradigmatic passengers.

Mixed methods , Qualitative research , Quantitative research , Paradigms , Post activism , Pragmatism
Advances in Nursing Science, vol.30pp.52 - 60
Rights statement
Copyright © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103 U.S.A. All rights reserved. Copyright in the documents ("Contents") on the Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Web Servers is owned by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW), unless otherwise indicated. LWW hereby authorizes you to copy documents published by LWW on the World Wide Web for non-commercial uses within your organization only. In consideration of this authorization, you agree that any copy of these documents which you make shall retain all copyright and other proprietary notices contained herein.