Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClear, AL
dc.contributor.authorClear, Tony
dc.contributor.editorMann, S
dc.contributor.editorVerhaart, M
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-25T03:29:14Z
dc.date.available2011-07-25T03:29:14Z
dc.date.copyright2011-07-05
dc.date.issued2011-07-25
dc.identifier.citation2nd Annual Conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education (CITRENZ2011) incorporating the 24th Annual NACCQ Conference, Rotorua, 6th to 9th July, vol.1, pages 51 - 62
dc.identifier.issn2230-2921
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/1510
dc.description.abstractThe prevailing ‘audit culture’ in national governments has seen a global proliferation of research performance evaluation schemes. Most recently the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) results have been published. The results from this bibliometrically based ranking exercise provide an interesting comparison with the earlier results from New Zealand’s Performance Based Research Fund (PBRF) exercise. With a focus on the computing disciplines this paper sets these developments in the global context; compares the outcomes under each scheme; the extent to which the prevailing publication cultures have been supported or undermined; the scope for such schemes to render whole sub-disciplines invisible and the potential impacts for the computing disciplines from such exercises.
dc.publisherCITRENZ
dc.relation.isreplacedby10292/3520
dc.relation.isreplacedbyhttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/3520
dc.relation.urihttp://www.naccq.ac.nz/conferences/2011/pdf/51-62.pdf
dc.rightsProvided by the author for research and private study in accordance with the publisher's policy.
dc.subjectResearch Performance Evaluation
dc.subjectBibliometrics
dc.subjectERA
dc.subjectPBRF
dc.titleThe fate of computing in research performance evaluation schemes – ERA vs PBRF
dc.typeConference Contribution
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record