AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies (Te Ara Auaha)
  • School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences - Te Kura Mātai Pūhanga, Rorohiko, Pāngarau
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies (Te Ara Auaha)
  • School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences - Te Kura Mātai Pūhanga, Rorohiko, Pāngarau
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Non-routine Mathematical Problem-Solving: Creativity, Engagement, and Intuition of STEM Tertiary Students

Evans, T; Klymchuk, S; Murphy, P; Novak, J; Stephens, J; Thomas, M
Thumbnail
View/Open
Journal article (505.4Kb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/14733
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
This study set out to evaluate an intervention that introduced a period of non-routine problem-solving into tertiary STEM lectures at four tertiary institutions in New Zealand for 683 students. The aim was twofold: to attempt to increase student engagement and to introduce them to the kind of domain-free abstract reasoning that involves critical, creative, and innovative thinking. This study was conducted using a mixed-methods approach, utilizing different types of instruments to gather data: comprehensive student pre- and post-test questionnaires, a content validation survey for the questionnaires, focus group interviews (student participants), open-ended questionnaire (lecturer participants), and naturalistic class observations. The main findings are as follows. Students' behavioural engagement was significantly greater during the intervention. Perceptions of the utility value of the activity improved at the end of the semester for all students. There were no significant changes in students' convergent thinking (problem-solving), intuition, or creativity (originality, fluency, and elaboration traits of the divergent thinking) during the course, probably due to the relatively short timescale of the intervention. However, overall, the results of the investigation suggest that with a relatively small effort, teachers can improve STEM student engagement by devoting a few minutes per lecture on non-routine problem-solving. This is something that can be easily implemented, even by those who primarily teach in a traditional lecturing style.
Keywords
Engagement; Puzzle-based learning; STEM education; Tertiary education; Mixed-methods
Date
November 24, 2021
Source
STEM Education, 2021, 1 (4) : 256-278. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021017
Item Type
Journal Article
DOI
10.3934/steme.2021017
Publisher's Version
https://www.aimsciences.org/article/doi/10.3934/steme.2021017
Rights Statement
©2021 The Author(s). Published by AIMS, LLC. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences - Te Kura Mātai Pūhanga, Rorohiko, PāngarauTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library