AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Management of Patients With Early Stage Lung Cancer - Why Do Some Patients Not Receive Treatment With Curative Intent?

Lawrenson, R; Lao, C; Brown, L; Moosa, L; Chepulis, L; Keenan, R; Kidd, J; Middleton, K; Conaglen, P; De Groot, C; Aitken, D; Wong, J
Thumbnail
View/Open
Journal article (868.6Kb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/13905
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: This study aims to understand the factors that influence whether patients receive potentially curative treatment for early stage lung cancer. A key question was whether indigenous Māori patients were less likely to receive treatment. METHODS: Patients included those diagnosed with early stage lung cancer in 2011-2018 and resident in the New Zealand Midland Cancer Network region. Logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratios of having curative surgery/ treatment. The Kaplan Meier method was used to examine the all-cause survival and Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of death. RESULTS: In total 419/583 (71.9%) of patients with Stage I and II disease were treated with curative intent - 272 (46.7%) patients had curative surgery. Patients not receiving potentially curative treatment were older, were less likely to have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), had poorer lung function and were more likely to have an ECOG performance status of 2+. Current smokers were less likely to be treated with surgery and more likely to receive treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Those who were treated with surgery had a 2-year survival of 87.8% (95% CI: 83.8-91.8%) and 5-year survival of 69.6% (95% CI: 63.2-76.0%). Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) has equivalent effect on survival compared to curative surgery (hazard ratio: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.37-1.61). After adjustment we could find no difference in treatment and survival between Māori and non-Māori. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with stage I and II lung cancer are managed with potentially curative treatment - mainly surgery and increasingly with SABR. The outcomes of those being diagnosed with stage I and II disease and receiving treatment is positive with 70% surviving 5 years.
Keywords
Lung cancer; Non-small cell lung cancer; Thoracic surgery; Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy; Smoking
Date
2020
Source
BMC Cancer, 20(1), 109.
Item Type
Journal Article
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
10.1186/s12885-020-6580-6
Publisher's Version
https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-020-6580-6
Rights Statement
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Clinical SciencesTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library