AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Pilot trial of The Living Well Toolkit: Qualitative analysis and implications for refinement and future implementation

Mudge, S; Sezier, A; Payne, D; Smith, G; Kayes, N
Thumbnail
View/Open
Journal article (1.413Mb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/13812
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following a neurological event, people's long-term health and well-being is hampered by a system that struggles to deliver person-centred communication and coordinated care and fails to harness individual and family capability to live well with the condition. We aimed to implement and evaluate a toolkit package to support these processes for people with long-term neurological conditions. METHODS: This is a multi-phased study drawing on the principles of participatory research. In this pilot phase, the toolkit package was introduced to clinicians, who introduced it to clients in four neurorehabilitation settings (inpatient and community-based). Individual and focus group interviews were carried out with clients (n = 10) and clinicians (n = 9). Data were categorised by the four components of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), and data within each component was then coded inductively. This analysis was used to inform revisions to the toolkit package and wider implementation processes. RESULTS: There was widespread support for the principles underpinning the toolkit package from clients and clinicians. However, it was less clear how the client toolkit could support these principles in clinical practice which impacted buy-in. The flexibility of use of the client toolkit, which we encouraged, made it difficult for clinicians and clients to be clear about its purpose and for clinicians to operationalise in practice. Clinicians and clients identified a number of barriers that limited the time, energy and work users were able or prepared to invest, to the extent that uptake of the toolkit package was modest. Use of the toolkit package appeared more likely when clinicians perceived it to augment existing processes (e.g. goal setting) rather than detract from 'doing' therapy. This analysis was used to inform revisions to the toolkit package, including simplification of the client toolkit, development of videos with examples of use and a modular and reflective training package for clinical services. The refinements were intended to improve sense-making and minimise the cognitive barriers associated with implementation of a new intervention. CONCLUSION: Understanding how supporting the client toolkit could add value to the therapeutic encounter was necessary for clinicians to invest time and perceive the worth of the toolkit package. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR: ACTRN12614000537651. Registered 21 May, 2014.
Keywords
Implementation; Long-term conditions; Normalisation process theory; Person-centred; Toolkit
Date
2020
Source
BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 69.
Item Type
Journal Article
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
10.1186/s12913-020-4920-5
Publisher's Version
https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-020-4920-5
Rights Statement
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Clinical SciencesTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library