Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCharlton, Jen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T23:55:40Z
dc.date.available2019-07-23T23:55:40Z
dc.date.copyright2019-07-18en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationMaHKUscript. Journal of Fine Art Research, 3(1), p.4. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/mjfar.41
dc.identifier.issn2397-0863en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/12688
dc.description.abstractIn the ten years since the seminal workshop on Speculative Realism at Goldsmiths College (Bassier), speculation has become the new noumenon of the art world: Promising the final fulfilment of the avant-garde dream that would finally emancipate the art object from indexicality, the speculative has held an irresistible appeal for artists (Beech, 1–2). As leader of the pack, Graham Harman’s Object Oriented Ontology (OOO) has become the champion of the cause. Yet, after all this speculation around realism, we seem to have got no closer to the real object of art than we ever where: OOO and its speculative variants, have left artists standing in the studio with nothing but a handful of sensual qualities that, as a symptom of transcendental withdrawal, are of little practical use. Speculation it seems has failed the facticity of practice and threatens to reduce art to little more than an indirect aesthetics. Anticipating the release of Harman’s Art and Object in mid 2019, this paper attempts to head off any speculative Greenbergian revitalisation by considering the implications of Tristan Garcia’s intensity with regard to the facticity of practice (Garcia, 2018). Central to Garcia’s ontology, intensity – the difference between what a thing is and what it is not – is seen to resists speculative naivety while informing practice’s need for certitude. Thus, unlike the speculative withdrawal of indirect aesthetic, aesthetics of intensity withhold nothing, and emerge in art practice as the tension between thought and action. Bassier, Ray, et al. “Speculative Realism.” Collapse, III, 2007, pp. 306–433. Beech, Amanda, et al. Speculative Aesthetics. Urbanomic, 2014. Garcia, Tristan. Life Intense: A Modern Obsession. Edinburgh University Press, 2018. Harman, Graham. “Aesthetics and the Tension in Objects.” [Met]Afourism, Midsea Books Ltd, 2018, pp. 11–19. Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Zero Books, 2011a. Harman, Graham. “The Road to Objects.” Continent, vol. 1.3, 2011b,171–179. Harman, Graham. Art and Object. Polity Press, 2019.
dc.languageenen_NZ
dc.publisherUbiquity Press, Ltd.en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mahkuscript.com/articles/10.5334/mjfar.41/
dc.rights© 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectSpeculative realism; Practice; OOO; Intensity; Aesthetics; Philosophy
dc.titleNo More and Less: The Withdrawal of Speculationen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccessen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/mjfar.41en_NZ
aut.relation.issue1en_NZ
aut.relation.volume3en_NZ
pubs.elements-id362060
aut.relation.journalMaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Researchen_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record