AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies (Te Ara Auaha)
  • School of Communication Studies - Te Kura Whakapāho
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies (Te Ara Auaha)
  • School of Communication Studies - Te Kura Whakapāho
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Flagging Diversity: The Discursive Construction of Cultural Diversity by the Flag Consideration Panel

Annabell, T; Nairn, A
Thumbnail
View/Open
Conference contribution (241.1Kb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/12410
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
The Flag Consideration Project invited New Zealanders to change the New Zealand flag, and in doing soprovided an opportunity for public discussion about what it means to belong to anation. This articleexaminesthe contemporary conceptualisations of New Zealand offered in the 5Alternatives text that accompanied the first flag consideration referendum.Given the increasing levels of cultural diversity and the historical difficulty faced in ensuring that multiple cultures contribute to the construction of New Zealand, the analysis focuses on constructions of cultural diversity. We used Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis to consider ideologies of nationhood prevalent in the text;in particular, we were interested in insights pertaining to bicultural and multicultural constructions of New Zealand. As it happens, the attemptsmade by the Flag Participation Panelto construct cultural diversity through asserting that New Zealand is inclusive and multicultural, and by referring to Māori culture as well as Chinese. On a surface level, it appears that the constructions address the limitations attached to the current flag, and specifically its Pākehāsymbolism. However, the language used by the Panel indicatesa continued reliance on a Pākehāperspective of New Zealand and the positioning of Māori as outside the mainstream. Therefore, although the text may have attempted to emphasise commonality and unity regardless of cultural affiliations, it inevitably tokenises cultural difference and offers a seemingly shallow notion of New Zealand as inclusive.
Keywords
Biculturalism; Cultural diversity; Flag Consideration Project; Multiculturalism; National flags
Date
December 29, 2017
Source
Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference 2017 - Communication Worlds: Access, Voice, Diversity, Engagement ISSN 1448-4331, available at: http://www.anzca.net/conferences/past-conferences/
Item Type
Conference Contribution
Publisher
Australian and New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA)
Publisher's Version
https://www.anzca.net/conferences/past-conferences/2017-conf/anzca17-annabell-and-nairn/file.html
Rights Statement
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Australian License.

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Communication Studies - Te Kura WhakapāhoTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library