Capturing meaning-making in journalism
| aut.relation.endpage | 78 | |
| aut.relation.startpage | 48 | |
| aut.relation.volume | 2 | |
| aut.researcher | Rupar, Verica | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rupar, V | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grunwald, E | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-28T03:45:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-01-28T03:45:58Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Performing content analysis is not merely a question of developing and using quantitatively-defined categories in order to investigate a research problem. If you want to go further and look at the meaning of the whole text, your analysis will meet challenges that go beyond numerical classification and coding. The strict numerical procedures of quantifying, classifying and counting have the advantage of objective control and reliability within research communities. However, they tend not to capture the ways meaning is produced, communicated and understood. In this article, we outline a dual procedure for the analysis of meaning-making in journalism. Using the software NVivo 8, we combine a qualitative and quantitative approach to the analysis of news texts. Following Franzosi (2010), we move “from words to numbers” and develop a methodological framework that supports investigation of the ways different cultural context, political reality and journalism culture generate narrative differences and produce alternative meanings. We use the case study of the two-year-long newspaper coverage of the Tasmanian devils sent as a christening gift to Danish Prince Christian to locate the process of meaning-making. Our analysis shows that the reconstruction of an event – a ‘real story’ –generates one or more story frames, which are related to the newsworthiness of the event, shared and hunted down by all journalists regardless of the country of origin or newspaper format. We found that journalists acted differently when selecting frames and refining them into angles where the choice of angles relates to a specific national and media format setting. The main advantage of this applied method is the precision in identifying the journalistic tools used to produce a specific meaning. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journalistika, vol.2, pp.48 - 78 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10292/6589 | |
| dc.publisher | The State and University Library - Aarhus | |
| dc.relation.uri | http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/journalistica/article/view/2676 | |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | |
| dc.subject | Journalism | |
| dc.subject | Meaning | |
| dc.subject | Frame | |
| dc.subject | Angle | |
| dc.subject | Narrative tools | |
| dc.title | Capturing meaning-making in journalism | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 136993 | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Design & Creative Technologies | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Design & Creative Technologies/School of Communication Studies |