AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The use of manual and ventilator hyperinflation by physiotherapists in New Zealand intensive care units

Reeve, JC; Munn, L; Quinn, L; Eagle, E; Jenson, L
Thumbnail
View/Open
2590NZJP abstracts1[1].pdf (370.4Kb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/1879
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
Manual hyperinflation (MHI) and ventilator hyperinflation (VHI) are techniques performed by physiotherapists in intubated, ventilated patients which deliver larger than baseline volume breaths to enhance secretion removal, improve oxygenation and re-expand atelectatic lung tissue. Studies have demonstrated these techniques to be widely used by physiotherapists in other countries. This study aimed to determine current practice of MHI and VHI by physiotherapists in New Zealand, investigating differences in the use of these techniques both nationally and internationally. A purpose-designed postal survey was distributed to the senior physiotherapist of each intensive care unit throughout New Zealand (n = 25). The response rate was 76% (n = 19). Twelve (63.2%) respondents reported using MHI, with only one (5.3%) respondent using VHI. The specific techniques and dosages used in applying MHI varied widely amongst respondents as did the equipment used to implement the technique. In those respondents using MHI, the incorporation of recommended safety equipment varied, with six (50%) respondents reporting never including airway pressure manometry. The majority of respondents using MHI always included a positive end expiratory pressure valve in the circuit (n = 8, 66.7%) and used 100% oxygen whilst undertaking the procedure (n = 7, 58.3%). Availability of equipment was the key factor in determining the specific methods used in delivering MHI. This survey has highlighted differences between New Zealand physiotherapists in the administration of MHI. It has also shown differences from those practices and recommendations emerging from overseas. Reasons for these differences should be further investigated.
Date
2008
Source
New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, New Zealand Society of Physiotherapy Biennial Conference, vol.36(2), pages 90
Item Type
Conference Contribution
Publisher
New Zealand Society of Physiotherapists
Publisher's Version
http://www.physiotherapy.org.nz/Folder?Action=View%20File&Folder_id=133&File=36(2)p78-95_AbstrNZSPBC08.pdf
Rights Statement
© NZ Society of Physiotherapists, 2008. All Rights Reserved. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy is available free of charge as an Open Access journal on the Internet. The definitive version was published in (see Citation). The original publication is available at (see Publisher's Version).

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Clinical SciencesTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library